For Ultralight Hikers, Water Bladders Are Better Than Bottles. Here’s Why.

The Smartwater bottle and Sawyer Squeeze filter combo is a mainstay of the ultralight hiking kit. The bottles are cheap, replaceable, and lightweight. The screw-on filter means you can collect water and filter on the move. In comparison, my preferred water-carrying system, the once-ubiquitous water bladder and hose, is now considered tedious, fragile, and—worst of all—heavy. Let’s bust some myths to explain why I still carry it.

Myth #1: Bladders Are Heavy
First, the weight. I often hear ultralight hikers explain that water bladders are simply too heavy to consider as an option. And if you’re looking at something like a 1.5-liter Camelbak that weighs 7 ounces, that’s fair. But today’s lightweight bladder systems are nearly as weight-efficient as using disposable bottles. A one-liter Smartwater bottle weighs 1.2 ounces, while a three-liter Platypus bladder and hose hits the scale at 3.8 ounces.

Continue reading to learn more, written by Nathan Pipenberg.

Backpacker: For Ultralight Hikers, Water Bladders Are Better Than Bottles. Here’s Why.

For Ultralight Hikers, Water Bladders Are Better Than Bottles. Here’s Why.

The Smartwater bottle and Sawyer Squeeze filter combo is a mainstay of the ultralight hiking kit. The bottles are cheap, replaceable, and lightweight. The screw-on filter means you can collect water and filter on the move. In comparison, my preferred water-carrying system, the once-ubiquitous water bladder and hose, is now considered tedious, fragile, and—worst of all—heavy. Let’s bust some myths to explain why I still carry it.

Myth #1: Bladders Are Heavy
First, the weight. I often hear ultralight hikers explain that water bladders are simply too heavy to consider as an option. And if you’re looking at something like a 1.5-liter Camelbak that weighs 7 ounces, that’s fair. But today’s lightweight bladder systems are nearly as weight-efficient as using disposable bottles. A one-liter Smartwater bottle weighs 1.2 ounces, while a three-liter Platypus bladder and hose hits the scale at 3.8 ounces.

Continue reading to learn more, written by Nathan Pipenberg.

照片缩略图 博客作者
作家
Nathan Pipenberg
Nathan’s work focuses on travel, the outdoors, and environmental issues.
媒体报道

Backpacker: For Ultralight Hikers, Water Bladders Are Better Than Bottles. Here’s Why.

For Ultralight Hikers, Water Bladders Are Better Than Bottles. Here’s Why.

The Smartwater bottle and Sawyer Squeeze filter combo is a mainstay of the ultralight hiking kit. The bottles are cheap, replaceable, and lightweight. The screw-on filter means you can collect water and filter on the move. In comparison, my preferred water-carrying system, the once-ubiquitous water bladder and hose, is now considered tedious, fragile, and—worst of all—heavy. Let’s bust some myths to explain why I still carry it.

Myth #1: Bladders Are Heavy
First, the weight. I often hear ultralight hikers explain that water bladders are simply too heavy to consider as an option. And if you’re looking at something like a 1.5-liter Camelbak that weighs 7 ounces, that’s fair. But today’s lightweight bladder systems are nearly as weight-efficient as using disposable bottles. A one-liter Smartwater bottle weighs 1.2 ounces, while a three-liter Platypus bladder and hose hits the scale at 3.8 ounces.

Continue reading to learn more, written by Nathan Pipenberg.

照片缩略图 博客作者
作家
Nathan Pipenberg
Nathan’s work focuses on travel, the outdoors, and environmental issues.
媒体报道
browse all articles
在索耶
April 6, 2026
6 Min
Yahoo! Shopping: 50+ Amazon Spring Sale Deals On Outdoor Gear
Read More
Explore All Sawyer has to Offer

Built for the Outdoors

see ALL PRODUCTS